Questões de Concursos | OAB | Enem | Vestibular

(1,0)

Sobre a ética utilitarista, marque a alternativa CORRETA.

(1,0)

Sobre teorias da verdade, marque a alternativa INCORRETA.

(1,0)

Sobre a teoria da justiça de John Rawls, marque a alternativa CORRETA.

(1,0)

Sobre a teoria da justiça de Robert Nozick, marque a alternativa INCORRETA.

(1,0)

O problema ambiental se tornou central nas discussões contemporâneas em todas as esferas, desde a política e a economia, passando pela alimentação, organização das cidades e educação. E no âmbito da filosofia, um dos focos é a conexão entre ética e ecologia, pensada a partir do que veio a se chamar de ética ambiental. Sobre isso, marque a alternativa CORRETA.

(1,0)

Em relação aos argumentos sobre a existência de Deus, marque a alternativa INCORRETA.

(1,0)

Sobre a Estética, seus problemas e teorias, podemos afirmar que

I - um problema central da Estética é o do gosto e, como resultado de suas investigações, este ficou definitivamente estabelecido como algo que não se pode discutir.

II - a arte é um dos objetos de estudo da Estética, refletindo sobre questões como: O que torna um objeto obra de arte? Qual a relação entre forma e conteúdo numa obra de arte?

III - o objetivismo estético sustenta que as qualidades estéticas são propriedades inerentes aos objetos e que, por conseguinte, a experiência estética nos proporciona conhecimento delas.

IV - o subjetivismo estético sustenta que as qualidades estéticas não são inerentes aos objetos, mas dependem da resposta do sujeito, ou seja, a experiência estética não oferece um conhecimento de tais propriedades.

Marque a alternativa CORRETA.

(1,0)

Sobre a filosofia da linguagem comum, muitas vezes chamada de filosofia da linguagem ordinária, marque a alternativa INCORRETA.

(1,0)

Sobre o problema do mal, podemos afirmar:

I - A existência do mal no mundo é um fato inegável e, como tal, seja como mal moral, seja como mal natural, gera o problema da crença na existência de um Deus.

II - A existência do mal conduz ao problema de como explicar a benevolência e a onipotência de Deus, uma vez que a existência de tantos males no mundo contradiz tais propriedades.

III - Alguns teóricos justificaram a presença do mal no mundo como necessária para possibilitar a realização de uma maior bondade moral, como por exemplo, a santidade. Sem o mal, a grande bondade moral de pessoas como Madre Tereza de Calcutá e Irmã Dulce não seria possível.

IV - Alguns teóricos argumentam para justificar a presença do mal no mundo a partir de uma analogia artística: da mesma maneira que a harmonia de uma peça musical envolve dissonâncias que são posteriormente resolvidas, o mal contribui para a harmonia ou beleza geral do mundo.

V - Uma outra tentativa de solução para o problema do mal é aquela chamada de defesa do livre-arbítrio: o mal é uma consequência necessária da liberdade de escolha, caso contrário, sem liberdade de escolha, não haveria de fato livre-arbítrio.

Marque a alternativa CORRETA.

(1,0)

Sobre as relações entre os conceitos de “alienação” e “ideologia”, marque a alternativa INCORRETA.

1. Texto da questão (clique para ver)

   Simulado SEDUC-PI | Professor – Inglês 2

   ×

                                                                     What if there were no bees? 

   It's a beautiful day for a picnic, but minutes after you spread a blanket on the grass and unpack an impressive selection of sandwiches, fruit salad and a show-stopping cherry pie, you discover an uninvited guest. A bee is making the rounds, buzzing around your head and scaring all your friends. You're about to swipe at the winged interloper with your shoe, but then think better of it. It's a good thing, too, because bee populations are dwindling. Consider these United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) survey results, based on 21.7 percent of the 2.6 million bee colonies in the United States. During the 2013-2014 winter, more than 23 percent of honeybees in the managed colonies included in the survey had died. The winter before that was even worse, when more than 30 percent of the hives died [source: Jones].
   And honeybees aren't the only bees at risk. There are more than 20,000 species of bees in the Hymenoptera order that are crucial to life as we know it [source: Encyclopedia Britannica]. So what would happen if there were no bees at all?
   Bees rely on pollen and nectar from plants for food. The nectar is later transformed into honey and the pollen is transferred from plant to plant as the bees travel, resulting in crosspollination. In fact, bees pollinate as much as 70 percent of the planet's top 100 food crops, including apples, avocadoes, cucumbers, nuts, squash and more [source: Greenpeace].
   Many of the diverse flavors and nutritional components in our food are the direct result of bees at work. And, without the crucial role bees play in agriculture, the world's food supplies would likely suffer. That's because an estimated one-third of all the food we eat relies on bees to flourish. Some of the foods we eat simply wouldn't exist without bees. Almonds, for instance, rely entirely on bees for pollination. In California alone, the almond crop needs 1.4 million bee colonies for successful pollination [source: USDA].
   If there were no bees, our food supply would be less varied and less available. While we might not go extinct, we would certainly need to find edible alternatives to many of the mainstay foods we currently enjoy -- particularly those crops dependent on bees for pollination -- and figure out ways to stave off economic hardship and famine until new cultivation methods could be developed.
   
   Source: adapted from http://science.howstuffworks.c... in June, 2015

   Fechar

(1,0)

Sobre o texto, pode-se afirmar que

1. Texto da questão (clique para ver)

   Simulado SEDUC-PI | Professor – Inglês 2

   ×

                                                                     What if there were no bees? 

   It's a beautiful day for a picnic, but minutes after you spread a blanket on the grass and unpack an impressive selection of sandwiches, fruit salad and a show-stopping cherry pie, you discover an uninvited guest. A bee is making the rounds, buzzing around your head and scaring all your friends. You're about to swipe at the winged interloper with your shoe, but then think better of it. It's a good thing, too, because bee populations are dwindling. Consider these United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) survey results, based on 21.7 percent of the 2.6 million bee colonies in the United States. During the 2013-2014 winter, more than 23 percent of honeybees in the managed colonies included in the survey had died. The winter before that was even worse, when more than 30 percent of the hives died [source: Jones].
   And honeybees aren't the only bees at risk. There are more than 20,000 species of bees in the Hymenoptera order that are crucial to life as we know it [source: Encyclopedia Britannica]. So what would happen if there were no bees at all?
   Bees rely on pollen and nectar from plants for food. The nectar is later transformed into honey and the pollen is transferred from plant to plant as the bees travel, resulting in crosspollination. In fact, bees pollinate as much as 70 percent of the planet's top 100 food crops, including apples, avocadoes, cucumbers, nuts, squash and more [source: Greenpeace].
   Many of the diverse flavors and nutritional components in our food are the direct result of bees at work. And, without the crucial role bees play in agriculture, the world's food supplies would likely suffer. That's because an estimated one-third of all the food we eat relies on bees to flourish. Some of the foods we eat simply wouldn't exist without bees. Almonds, for instance, rely entirely on bees for pollination. In California alone, the almond crop needs 1.4 million bee colonies for successful pollination [source: USDA].
   If there were no bees, our food supply would be less varied and less available. While we might not go extinct, we would certainly need to find edible alternatives to many of the mainstay foods we currently enjoy -- particularly those crops dependent on bees for pollination -- and figure out ways to stave off economic hardship and famine until new cultivation methods could be developed.
   
   Source: adapted from http://science.howstuffworks.c... in June, 2015

   Fechar

(1,0)

De acordo com as ideias do texto é CORRETO afirmar que

1. Texto da questão (clique para ver)

   Simulado SEDUC-PI | Professor – Inglês 2

   ×

                                                                     What if there were no bees? 

   It's a beautiful day for a picnic, but minutes after you spread a blanket on the grass and unpack an impressive selection of sandwiches, fruit salad and a show-stopping cherry pie, you discover an uninvited guest. A bee is making the rounds, buzzing around your head and scaring all your friends. You're about to swipe at the winged interloper with your shoe, but then think better of it. It's a good thing, too, because bee populations are dwindling. Consider these United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) survey results, based on 21.7 percent of the 2.6 million bee colonies in the United States. During the 2013-2014 winter, more than 23 percent of honeybees in the managed colonies included in the survey had died. The winter before that was even worse, when more than 30 percent of the hives died [source: Jones].
   And honeybees aren't the only bees at risk. There are more than 20,000 species of bees in the Hymenoptera order that are crucial to life as we know it [source: Encyclopedia Britannica]. So what would happen if there were no bees at all?
   Bees rely on pollen and nectar from plants for food. The nectar is later transformed into honey and the pollen is transferred from plant to plant as the bees travel, resulting in crosspollination. In fact, bees pollinate as much as 70 percent of the planet's top 100 food crops, including apples, avocadoes, cucumbers, nuts, squash and more [source: Greenpeace].
   Many of the diverse flavors and nutritional components in our food are the direct result of bees at work. And, without the crucial role bees play in agriculture, the world's food supplies would likely suffer. That's because an estimated one-third of all the food we eat relies on bees to flourish. Some of the foods we eat simply wouldn't exist without bees. Almonds, for instance, rely entirely on bees for pollination. In California alone, the almond crop needs 1.4 million bee colonies for successful pollination [source: USDA].
   If there were no bees, our food supply would be less varied and less available. While we might not go extinct, we would certainly need to find edible alternatives to many of the mainstay foods we currently enjoy -- particularly those crops dependent on bees for pollination -- and figure out ways to stave off economic hardship and famine until new cultivation methods could be developed.
   
   Source: adapted from http://science.howstuffworks.c... in June, 2015

   Fechar

(1,0)

De acordo com as ideias do texto, a atividade desempenhada pela abelha que mais tem importância para as plantações é

1. Texto da questão (clique para ver)

   Simulado SEDUC-PI | Professor – Inglês 2

   ×

                                                                     What if there were no bees? 

   It's a beautiful day for a picnic, but minutes after you spread a blanket on the grass and unpack an impressive selection of sandwiches, fruit salad and a show-stopping cherry pie, you discover an uninvited guest. A bee is making the rounds, buzzing around your head and scaring all your friends. You're about to swipe at the winged interloper with your shoe, but then think better of it. It's a good thing, too, because bee populations are dwindling. Consider these United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) survey results, based on 21.7 percent of the 2.6 million bee colonies in the United States. During the 2013-2014 winter, more than 23 percent of honeybees in the managed colonies included in the survey had died. The winter before that was even worse, when more than 30 percent of the hives died [source: Jones].
   And honeybees aren't the only bees at risk. There are more than 20,000 species of bees in the Hymenoptera order that are crucial to life as we know it [source: Encyclopedia Britannica]. So what would happen if there were no bees at all?
   Bees rely on pollen and nectar from plants for food. The nectar is later transformed into honey and the pollen is transferred from plant to plant as the bees travel, resulting in crosspollination. In fact, bees pollinate as much as 70 percent of the planet's top 100 food crops, including apples, avocadoes, cucumbers, nuts, squash and more [source: Greenpeace].
   Many of the diverse flavors and nutritional components in our food are the direct result of bees at work. And, without the crucial role bees play in agriculture, the world's food supplies would likely suffer. That's because an estimated one-third of all the food we eat relies on bees to flourish. Some of the foods we eat simply wouldn't exist without bees. Almonds, for instance, rely entirely on bees for pollination. In California alone, the almond crop needs 1.4 million bee colonies for successful pollination [source: USDA].
   If there were no bees, our food supply would be less varied and less available. While we might not go extinct, we would certainly need to find edible alternatives to many of the mainstay foods we currently enjoy -- particularly those crops dependent on bees for pollination -- and figure out ways to stave off economic hardship and famine until new cultivation methods could be developed.
   
   Source: adapted from http://science.howstuffworks.c... in June, 2015

   Fechar

(1,0)

De acordo com o texto, caso as abelhas deixassem de existir, a única alternativa que NÃO poderíamos inferir é

1. Texto da questão (clique para ver)

   Simulado SEDUC-PI | Professor – Inglês 2

   ×

                                                                     What if there were no bees? 

   It's a beautiful day for a picnic, but minutes after you spread a blanket on the grass and unpack an impressive selection of sandwiches, fruit salad and a show-stopping cherry pie, you discover an uninvited guest. A bee is making the rounds, buzzing around your head and scaring all your friends. You're about to swipe at the winged interloper with your shoe, but then think better of it. It's a good thing, too, because bee populations are dwindling. Consider these United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) survey results, based on 21.7 percent of the 2.6 million bee colonies in the United States. During the 2013-2014 winter, more than 23 percent of honeybees in the managed colonies included in the survey had died. The winter before that was even worse, when more than 30 percent of the hives died [source: Jones].
   And honeybees aren't the only bees at risk. There are more than 20,000 species of bees in the Hymenoptera order that are crucial to life as we know it [source: Encyclopedia Britannica]. So what would happen if there were no bees at all?
   Bees rely on pollen and nectar from plants for food. The nectar is later transformed into honey and the pollen is transferred from plant to plant as the bees travel, resulting in crosspollination. In fact, bees pollinate as much as 70 percent of the planet's top 100 food crops, including apples, avocadoes, cucumbers, nuts, squash and more [source: Greenpeace].
   Many of the diverse flavors and nutritional components in our food are the direct result of bees at work. And, without the crucial role bees play in agriculture, the world's food supplies would likely suffer. That's because an estimated one-third of all the food we eat relies on bees to flourish. Some of the foods we eat simply wouldn't exist without bees. Almonds, for instance, rely entirely on bees for pollination. In California alone, the almond crop needs 1.4 million bee colonies for successful pollination [source: USDA].
   If there were no bees, our food supply would be less varied and less available. While we might not go extinct, we would certainly need to find edible alternatives to many of the mainstay foods we currently enjoy -- particularly those crops dependent on bees for pollination -- and figure out ways to stave off economic hardship and famine until new cultivation methods could be developed.
   
   Source: adapted from http://science.howstuffworks.c... in June, 2015

   Fechar

(1,0)

De acordo com o texto, na frase “we would certainly need to find edible alternatives to many of the mainstay foods we currently enjoy", a melhor tradução para a palavra destacada, tendo em vista o contexto, é